State of Rhode Island Department of Transportation v. Providence & Worcester Railroad Co.
Rhode Island Supreme Court
674 A.2d 1239 (1996)
- Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Facts
Providence and Worcester Railroad Co. (P&W) (codefendant) sold a piece of property with abandoned railroad tracks on it to Promet Corp. (codefendant) for $100,000. Beforehand, P&W offered the state an option to purchase the property at that price, as required by Rhode Island law. The State of Rhode Island Department of Transportation (state) (plaintiff) responded with a letter stating that it accepted the offer as made at $100,000, except unlike Promet, it would not require removal of the tracks. But P&W moved up the closing time and sold the property to Promet an hour and a half before the state tendered its check for $100,000. The state sued P&W and Promet for the property. The trial court found the state’s letter was a valid acceptance of P&W’s offer, making the sale to Promet null and void, and ordered P&W to convey the property to the state. P&W appealed, arguing that the state’s letter was not a valid acceptance.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Lederberg, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.