State of Wisconsin ex rel. Anderson v. Town of Newbold

935 N.W.2d 856 (2019)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

State of Wisconsin ex rel. Anderson v. Town of Newbold

Wisconsin Court of Appeals
935 N.W.2d 856 (2019)

  • Written by Haley Gintis, JD

Facts

Michael Anderson (plaintiff) sued the town of Newbold (the town) (defendant) in Wisconsin state court for exceeding its statutory authority. Anderson argued that the shoreland regulation the town had passed, which the town labeled as a shoreland subdivision regulation, was actually a shoreland zoning ordinance. The state authorized towns to pass shoreland subdivision regulations but reserved the authority to pass shoreland zoning ordinances to counties. Anderson argued that the regulation was a zoning ordinance because it had many distinct zoning characteristics. Alternatively, Anderson argued that the town’s shoreline regulation was impermissible because the town should not be permitted to pass a regulation pursuant to its authority to pass subdivision regulations if it would be unable to pass the same regulation as a zoning ordinance. The trial court returned a verdict in favor of the town. The matter was appealed to the Wisconsin Court of Appeals.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Seidl, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership