Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

State of Wyoming v. United States

United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
279 F.3d 1214 (2002)


Facts

Beginning in 1930, elk in the State of Wyoming (Wyoming) (plaintiff) became infected with brucellosis, a disease that caused miscarriages. In 1985, Wyoming began to vaccinate elk located on state property. Wyoming sought approval from the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) to vaccinate elk located within Wyoming’s National Elk Refuge (NER). A failure to obtain the FWS’s approval would jeopardize Wyoming’s federal certification as a brucellosis-free cattle industry. The FWS denied Wyoming’s request on the basis that there was inadequate data to determine the vaccine’s safety and effectiveness. For over 10 years, the FWS failed to make a final determination regarding the vaccine’s safety and effectiveness. Wyoming sued the federal government (defendant) in district court, claiming that Wyoming had a sovereign right to manage elk within the NER. A savings clause within the National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act (Act), 16 U.S.C. §§ 668dd-ee, stated that the Act should not be construed to limit state authority to manage wildlife within the national wildlife-refuge system. Wyoming also claimed that the FWS’s failure to allow elk vaccinations in the NER violated the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5 U.S.C. §§ 701-06. The district court dismissed Wyoming’s complaint, finding that the Act gave the FWS unlimited discretion to manage wildlife in the NER. Wyoming appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Baldock, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 174,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.