State Security Check Cashing, Inc. v. American General Financial Services (DE)
Maryland Court of Appeals
409 Md. 81, 972 A.2d 882 (2009)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
A man (imposter) purporting to be Ronald Wilder called American General Financial Services, Inc. (AG) (defendant) to procure a $20,000 loan. The imposter presented two years’ worth of personal tax returns as part of the loan-application process. Thereafter, the imposter went to AG’s office and provided, as identification, a license with his own photo and Ronald Wilder’s identifying information. AG then issued an $18,000 loan check without calling the personal references provided by the imposter. The imposter subsequently appeared at State Security Check Cashing, Inc. (State Security) (plaintiff) to cash the check, offering the same license previously presented to AG. The State Security employee confirmed with a State Security compliance officer that the employee had taken all actions required to properly verify the check. Upon supervisory approval, State Security cashed the check. After receiving notification of the fraud from the real Ronald Wilder, AG placed a stop-payment order on the check. State Security brought suit against AG, arguing that AG was liable for the loss because State Security was a holder in due course. The trial court found in AG’s favor, determining that State Security did not exercise ordinary care under Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) § 3-404 when paying the check, and that this failure played a significant role in the loss. State Security appealed. The intermediate circuit court affirmed. The Maryland Court of Appeals granted State Security’s petition for writ of certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Harrell, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.