State Tax Commission v. Shor
New York Court of Appeals
371 N.E.2d 523, 400 N.Y.S.2d 805, 43 N.Y.2d 151 (1977)
- Written by Laura Julien, JD
Facts
Bernard Shor (defendant) held 1,400 shares of stock and a proprietary leasehold interest in his cooperative apartment located on Park Avenue in New York City. A cooperative corporation owned the land and the building, and the tenants within the cooperative owned shares of stock instead of a deed. Shor’s proprietary lease agreement provided the lessor, 480 Park Avenue Corporation (Park Avenue) (plaintiff), with a priority lien on Shor’s shares of stock and his monetary obligations arising under the proprietary lease. In 1967 Shor granted Chase Manhattan Bank (Chase) (plaintiff) a security interest and a general lien on all of Shor’s personal-property interests, and Chase held Shor’s stock certificates and proprietary lease as collateral. On February 6, 1970, Fidelity National Bank (Fidelity) (defendant) obtained and docketed a $152,589 judgment against Shor; however, Fidelity never executed the lien on Shor’s property. Ultimately, $40,000 of Fidelity’s judgment was recovered. In April 1972, Chase obtained a judgment against Shor for approximately $44,223. In 1973 Shor was evicted from the cooperative apartment because of his failure to pay maintenance charges under the proprietary lease. Park Avenue claimed a first lien of approximately $63,908. Chase also asserted a first lien of approximately $67,800, plus attorney’s fees. In April 1971, the State Tax Commission (the tax commission) (plaintiff) had filed a tax warrant against Shor. Upon the sale of the apartment, Park Avenue, Chase, and the tax commission authorized the sale of the collateral, and the sale realized $141,000. Fidelity filed an interpleader as a defendant and asserted that Shor’s interest in the cooperative apartment was chattel real and therefore should be treated as real property with regard to determining lien-priority status. Accordingly, Fidelity contended that its 1970 action provided it with priority over the other three creditors. The court entered a money-judgment order in favor of Park Avenue, Chase, and the tax commission, and Fidelity filed an appeal.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Breitel, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.