State v. Akers
New Hampshire Supreme Court
400 A.2d 38 (1979)
- Written by Craig Conway, LLM
Facts
The minor sons of Melvin Akers and Marshal Fox (defendants) were found guilty of illegally driving snowmobiles on a public way at an excessive speed. The State also charged defendants for their sons’ crimes on a theory of vicarious liability under a state statute that provided that a parent or guardian shall be responsible for any damage incurred or violations of the law covering the operation of a snowmobile. Defendants were found guilty and they appealed, arguing that a parent cannot be held criminally responsible for the acts of a child solely based on their parental status.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Grimes, J.)
Dissent (Bois, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.