State v. Apfelbacher

167 N.W. 244, 167 Wis. 233 (1918)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

State v. Apfelbacher

Wisconsin Supreme Court
167 N.W. 244, 167 Wis. 233 (1918)

Facts

Humphrey (defendant) operated a gristmill powered by the Bark River outlet from Lake Nagawicka, facilitated by a dam controlled by Humphrey. George Apfelbacher (plaintiff) had a similar but later-established gristmill operation downstream from Humphrey’s operation, also facilitated by a dam. Both mill operations coexisted and operated continuously with the natural flow of the Bark River. The State of Wisconsin (the state) (defendant) built a fish hatchery between the two mill operations using water diverted from the Bark River. The state contracted with Humphrey to ensure water availability and maintenance of Lake Nagawicka. The contract required Humphrey to cease his mill operations if the lake’s waters receded more than twelve inches because of the state’s fish-hatchery operation. When Humphrey ceased operations due to lowered lake levels, as required by the contract with the state, the water flow to Apfelbacher’s mill diminished, significantly interfering with Apfelbacher’s business. Apfelbacher sued the state and Humphrey seeking injunctive relief. The trial court issued a judgment holding that the state’s use of the water was unreasonable.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Eschweiler, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership