State v. Ball

756 So. 2d 275 (1999)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

State v. Ball

Louisiana Supreme Court
756 So. 2d 275 (1999)

Facts

In November of 1996, Ricko Ball (defendant) stole Mary Upton’s minivan from Upton’s driveway. When officers found Ball and the minivan, they saw a shotgun and rifle on the minivan’s floor between the front seats. After the district attorney learned that Ball had previously pleaded guilty to burglarizing a house in 1993, the district attorney charged Ball with possession of a firearm by a convicted felon under a Louisiana statute that prohibited people who had previously been convicted of burglary and other enumerated crimes from possessing firearms or carrying concealed weapons. Before trial, Ball made a motion in limine in which he offered to stipulate that he had previously been convicted of a felony that would bar him from possessing a firearm. In return, Ball asked the trial court to prohibit the prosecution (plaintiff) from presenting evidence regarding his burglary conviction. The trial court denied Ball’s motion. The jury ultimately found Ball guilty, and he appealed. The court of appeal affirmed, and the Louisiana Supreme Court granted review.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Victory, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership