State v. Beatty

495 S.E.2d 367 (1998)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

State v. Beatty

North Carolina Supreme Court
495 S.E.2d 367 (1998)

  • Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD

Facts

Edward Beatty (defendant) and several other men robbed a restaurant. As they approached, the owner was standing outside the door. The robbers put a gun to his head and told him to open the safe. Inside, the robbers saw two restaurant employees, Hristos Poulos, who was washing the floor near the front, and Tom Koufaloitis, who was standing near the safe in the back. One robber held a gun to Poulos’s head and guarded him. An unarmed robber duct-taped Koufaloitis’s wrists, made him lie on the floor, and kicked him twice. Meanwhile, the owner failed to open the safe on the first try. The robbers said to hurry up and shot him twice in the legs, and the owner opened the safe. The robbers took the money and fled, with the whole robbery taking three to four minutes. In addition to robbery and assault, a jury convicted Beatty on two counts of second-degree kidnapping based on restraining the two restaurant employees. The appellate court affirmed with one judge dissenting. Beatty appealed to the North Carolina Supreme Court, arguing the evidence did not show restraint separate from that necessarily involved in committing the robbery, so it could not count as the separate crime of kidnapping.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Whichard, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership