Minnesota Supreme Court
678 N.W.2d 42 (2004)
A police officer witnessed Steven Benniefield (defendant) walking close to the Riverside School property line late at night. After confirming that there was an outstanding warrant for Benniefield’s arrest, the officer arrested Benniefield. The officer discovered a crack pipe on Benniefield during a pat-down. After another officer drove Benniefield to the correctional center, the officer found a bag containing 1.1 grams of cocaine in the officer’s squad car. Bennifield was convicted of third-degree possession of a controlled substance within a school zone. At trial, Benniefield argued that he did not intend to be in a school zone and was merely walking the most direct route between work and his home. Benniefield appealed his conviction on the grounds that: (1) harsher punishments for drug possession inside school zones violate the equal protection guarantee of the Minnesota Constitution, and (2) the trial court erred by failing to instruct the jury that intent to be in a school zone was a required element of the offense. The court of appeals affirmed Benniefield’s conviction, and Benniefield appealed again on the same grounds.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Hanson, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 218,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.