State v. Bolsinger

699 P.2d 1214 (1985)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

State v. Bolsinger

Utah Supreme Court
699 P.2d 1214 (1985)

Facts

Kaysie Sorensen and Bolsinger (defendant) had consensual sexual intercourse while they were both drunk. At some point a clock-radio cord was wrapped around Sorensen’s throat and tightened briefly in an act of sexual asphyxiation. A few moments later Bolsinger noticed that Sorensen looked strange and was not reacting. He panicked, covered her with a sheet, rummaged through her purse, took his bottle of alcohol and a stereo, and left. Bolsinger was charged in her death and offered conflicting testimony during his confession and at trial over whether he or Sorensen had initiated the asphyxiation and exactly when and how it had occurred. He consistently claimed, however, that there had been no struggle or argument and that he had had no intention of hurting her. The medical evidence found that there was no structural damage to her neck, and that an intoxicated person could die from pressure applied to the throat much faster than a sober person would. Bolsinger was convicted of second-degree murder and appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Howe, J.)

Dissent

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership