Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

State v. Boyett

144 N.M. 184 (2008)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 33,800+ case briefs...

State v. Boyett

New Mexico Supreme Court

144 N.M. 184 (2008)

Play video

Facts

Deborah Rhodes and Renate Wilder were childhood friends who eventually developed an intimate relationship and moved in together. Thereafter, the couple’s romance ended, but they continued to remain close and live together. Wilder later met Cecil Boyett (defendant) and the two became romantically involved. Eventually, Wilder began spending more time with Boyett than with Rhodes. Wilder even fired Rhodes from her job at Wilder’s bar and hired Boyett instead. Rhodes moved out of the couple’s home and Boyett moved in. Wilder and Boyett planned to get married. Prior to the wedding, Wilder left the couple’s home and spent time with Rhodes without telling Boyett where she was going. Although Boyett suspected that Wilder was with Rhodes, he could not confirm that fact. After a short period of time, Wilder left Rhodes’ home to return to Boyett but had a car accident which required her to walk back to her house. After Wilder had returned to Boyett, Rhodes arrived at their house and knocked on the door. Sometime after opening the door but before Rhodes entered the home, Boyett shot and killed her. Boyett was charged with first-degree murder. At trial, Boyett testified that he shot Rhodes because he believed she was reaching for a gun that she often carried on her person and that he fired in self-defense, defense of Wilder, and in defense of his home. The trial court did not instruct the jury on defense of habitation because Rhodes had not crossed the threshold into the home before Boyett killed her. Boyett was convicted of first-degree murder and he appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Serna, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 604,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 604,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,800 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 604,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 33,800 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership