Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

State v. Brown

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee
No. M2000-00388-CCA-R3-CD (2001)


Facts

Minnie Montgomery, an employee of Nicholson Cleaners, was unloading clothes from a company van. A man, Brown (defendant), walked up and offered assistance, but Montgomery declined and kept working. Shortly thereafter, Montgomery looked up and saw the van moving toward the parking lot’s exit. While a co-worker called the police, Montgomery attempted to run after the van. Before the vehicle disappeared, Montgomery was able to see and recognize the driver as Brown. A description of the van was broadcast to the police, and Officer Michael Moss immediately went to an alley where thieves were known to often deposit stolen vehicles. Moss found the van in the alley with the suspect still inside. Brown tried to escape, but the doors of the van were blocked. Approximately 15 minutes after the van was taken, Brown was arrested with the keys to the van in his possession. After an inspection, it was determined that nothing was missing from the van. At trial, the owner of Nicholson Cleaners testified that the van was worth $2,000. Brown was convicted of theft, which required intent to deprive an owner of property worth between $1,000 and $10,000 while knowingly obtaining or exercising control over the property without the owner’s effective consent. The deprivation requirement was defined as the withholding of property from the owner either permanently or for such a period of time as to substantially diminish the value or enjoyment of the property to the owner. Brown appealed, arguing that he did not withhold the vehicle for long enough to have the requisite intent to deprive.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Woodall, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.