Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

State v. C.R. and R.R.

Utah Court of Appeals
797 P.2d 459 (1990)


Facts

Fifteen-year-old R.R. left home in October 1984 and went to live with various relatives. His parents, C.R. and R.R. (defendants), alleged that he left voluntarily because he refused to comply with their demand that he abandon his homosexual way of life. In the boy’s defense, it was alleged that he was forced out of his parents’ home. In July 1985, the boy was adjudged to be dependent on the state of Utah (plaintiff) without objection by his parents. The Utah Department of Family Services (DFS) took temporary custody of the boy. On the expiration of the temporary custody order in October 1986, custody of R.R. was returned to his parents under DFS supervision. The state of Utah then filed suit against the parents for reimbursement of $1,159.06, representing the amount that the state had spent on R.R. between January 1985 and October 1986. The parents challenged the suit on the basis of the doctrine of emancipation, arguing that the boy was emancipated from their care, responsibility, and control when he voluntarily left home. The state responded that the parents had failed to prove emancipation because they provided no evidence that the boy was capable of living on his own. The juvenile court declined to apply the law of emancipation, and an appeal was taken. 

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Jackson, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 176,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.