Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

State v. Cameron

674 P.2d 650 (1983)

Case BriefQ&ARelatedOptions
From our private database of 22,600+ case briefs...

State v. Cameron

Washington Supreme Court

674 P.2d 650 (1983)

Facts

Gary Cameron (defendant) stabbed his stepmother 97 times and left her body in the bathtub, the knife sticking in her heart. Cameron claimed God ordered the killing because his stepmother was an agent of Satan who was persecuting him. Cameron knew what he was doing violated the law, but he believed he was following a higher directive from God. Before trial, Cameron requested acquittal on insanity grounds. Three psychiatrists and a psychologist testified that Cameron had paranoid schizophrenia at the time of the killing and the time of trial. All four agreed that Cameron believed he was a messiah or agent of God required to carry out God’s directives and believed that God had commanded him to kill his stepmother as an evil spirit. As a result, the doctors agreed that Cameron was legally insane at the time of the murder. However, the trial judge denied the motion to acquit and instead submitted the insanity issue to the jury. The judge instructed the jury using the Washington pattern instruction on insanity, which specified that acquittal required finding that a mental disease or defect made the accused “unable to perceive the nature and quality of the acts” charged or “unable to tell right from wrong.” The judge also added a sentence the Washington courts had approved in another case: “What is meant by the terms ‘right and wrong’ refers to knowledge of a person at the time of committing an act that he was acting contrary to the law.” The jury convicted, and the appellate court affirmed. Cameron appealed to the Washington Supreme Court, arguing the sentence the trial judge added to the pattern jury instruction prevented the jury from considering moral right and wrong, instead of only legal right and wrong.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Stafford, J.)

Concurrence (Dore, J.)

Dissent (Dimmick, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 519,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 519,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 22,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions and answers

Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 519,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 22,600 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership