State v. City of Rochester

268 N.W.2d 885 (1978)

From our private database of 45,900+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

State v. City of Rochester

Minnesota Supreme Court
268 N.W.2d 885 (1978)

  • Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Play video

Facts

Rodney Younge (defendant) contracted to purchase a 1.18-acre parcel to construct an apartment building near downtown Rochester, contingent on rezoning the property from single-family and low-density residential to high-density residential. Two high-density apartment buildings bordered the parcel, with single-family and low-density multifamily homes on the other two sides. The planning department recommended tabling the rezoning to study whether to amend the land-use plan, and the planning commission recommended denying the rezoning as inconsistent with the plan. After a hearing and protest proceedings, the council nonetheless approved the rezoning, without written reasons or findings of fact in support. However, the meeting minutes showed the council found the site ideal for an apartment building to serve growing housing requirements near downtown and unlikely to be developed otherwise because of the neighboring apartment buildings. The council then amended its land-use plan accordingly. The Rochester Association of Neighborhoods (the association) (plaintiff) and neighboring homeowners (opponents) opposed the rezoning as (1) a presumptively invalid quasi-judicial act; (2) if a legislative act, arbitrary and capricious because incongruous with the land-use plan and not reasonably related to public welfare; and (3) invalid spot zoning. The trial court upheld the rezoning, and the association appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Rogosheske, J.)

Dissent (Kelly, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 736,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 736,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 736,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 45,900 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership