State v. Coleman

944 N.W.2d 469 (2020)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

State v. Coleman

Minnesota Court of Appeals
944 N.W.2d 469 (2020)

  • Written by Noah Lewis, JD
Play video

Facts

Eric Joseph Coleman (defendant), intoxicated, drove his snowmobile at 58 miles per hour at night on a lake where people were ice fishing. A family of four had set up a portable six-foot-tall ice-fishing house, which had reflectors on all four corners. Coleman drove his snowmobile right at the family, striking and killing an eight-year-old boy, injuring the boy’s father, hitting the family’s pickup truck, and going straight through the fishing house. Coleman was charged with, and a jury found him guilty of, third-degree murder, two counts of criminal-vehicular homicide, two counts of gross-misdemeanor-criminal-vehicular operation, and two counts of gross misdemeanor driving while impaired (DWI). Coleman failed to object at trial to the use of model jury instruction for third-degree murder, which, as written, permitted conviction if Coleman acted with mere knowledge that someone may be killed. The district court sentenced Coleman concurrently to 150 months in prison for third-degree murder and 365 days in jail for one count of gross misdemeanor criminal vehicular operation. Coleman was not sentenced for the remaining offenses. Coleman appealed, arguing that the district court plainly erred in instructing the jury on the mens rea element of third-degree murder.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Cochran, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership