Arizona Supreme Court
529 P.2d 231 (1974)
Eugene Raymond Cooper (defendant) was driving recklessly through a shopping center parking lot when he was pursued by a police officer. Cooper led the police officer on a high-speed chase during rush hour traffic. Cooper shot and wounded the pursuing police officer and then kidnapped a man in a parking lot at gunpoint. The kidnapped man wrestled the gun away from Cooper and the vehicle crashed into the divider on a freeway. Although Cooper attempted to run, he was quickly apprehended and charged with kidnapping and assault with a deadly weapon. At the request of Cooper’s counsel, the court appointed psychiatrists to examine Cooper’s mental condition prior to trial. The psychiatrists reported that Cooper was competent to stand trial. Cooper’s counsel then timely gave notice of his intention to raise the defense of insanity at trial. During the trial, Cooper’s counsel offered testimony from a psychiatrist and a psychologist as to Cooper’s mental condition at the time of the offense. Both experts testified that had Cooper not been on amphetamines for several days prior to the offense, he would have been sane. After hearing the testimony, the trial judge held that the evidence did not raise an issue as to Cooper’s sanity and would not be heard by the jury. Further, the trial judge refused all of Cooper’s jury instructions related to the issue of a defense of insanity. Cooper was convicted of kidnapping and assault with a deadly weapon and sentenced to concurrent terms of 30 years to life on both charges. He appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Holohan, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 239,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.