State v. Corbin

343 N.W.2d 874 (1984)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

State v. Corbin

Minnesota Court of Appeals
343 N.W.2d 874 (1984)

Facts

Jay Corbin and Ronald Niebuhr (collectively, the hunters) (defendants), along with members of their hunting party, requested permission from Wayne and Ed Soost to hunt on the Soosts’ farms. The Soosts permitted the hunting party to enter the land but instructed the hunters not to enter the cornfield. Subsequently, the hunters asked for permission to enter the cornfield to retrieve a wounded deer, and the Soosts refused. At no time did the Soosts post signage prohibiting entry to any part of their land; all communications and notifications from the Soosts to the hunters were verbal. It was later discovered that the hunters entered the cornfield despite having been told not to do so. The state (plaintiff) charged the hunters with trespassing. The trial court issued a pretrial order informing the parties that it would instruct the jury that a Minnesota law related to retrieval of injured game provided a defense to a complaint of misdemeanor trespass. The state appealed the pretrial order.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Lansing, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 815,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership