State v. Crawford
Maryland Court of Appeals
308 Md. 683, 521 A.2d 1193 (1987)
- Written by Noah Lewis, JD
Facts
Leonard Crawford (defendant) was attacked and shot in his apartment. In wrestling the gun from an assailant, Crawford fell out of his second-story apartment window. The gun landed next to him. Crawford heard someone approaching and picked up the gun to defend himself. Crawford was wounded and dazed and had no opportunity to try to contact the police. Crawford tried to crawl away, but his assailants pursued him and shot him. Once Crawford saw a police officer, he surrendered the gun. Crawford was charged with assault and illegally carrying a handgun in violation of a state statute, Art. 27, § 36B(b), which established a blanket rule prohibiting any person from carrying, whether open or concealed, any handgun. The only exceptions were for law-enforcement personnel, persons with permits, persons transporting handguns for legitimate purposes, and persons on their own property. Permits may be granted when possessing the gun is necessary as a reasonable precaution against apprehended danger. Crawford had no permit for the gun. At trial, Crawford’s counsel requested a jury instruction as to the availability of the defense of necessity to the charge of unlawful possession of a handgun. The trial court declined to give the instruction. The jury found Crawford not guilty of assault, but guilty of unlawful possession of a handgun. The court of special appeals reversed, holding that Crawford had a right, under the circumstances, to possess the gun. The Maryland Court of Appeals granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Cole, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.