From our private database of 30,900+ case briefs...
State v. Dent
Washington Supreme Court
123 Wash. 2d 467, 869 P.2d 392 (1994)
Roland C. Dent (defendant) had a relationship with Ann Powell while he was on parole. Powell told Dent’s parole officer that Dent had assaulted her, and Dent’s parole was revoked. Dent was sent to jail and met Carlos Balcinde (defendant). While in jail, Dent and Balcinde discussed killing Powell. Dent was transferred to another jail and began using his current girlfriend, Joyful Tryon, to communicate with Balcinde. Dent asked Tryon to forward letters to Balcinde, give Balcinde a handgun owned by Tryon, after removing the serial number and reporting it stolen, set aside $300 to $400 to pay Balcinde, pick up Balcinde when he was released, show Balcinde a video of Powell, and show Balcinde where Powell lived. Dent told Tryon that the gun was going to be used for Powell. Tryon’s sons convinced Tryon to tell the police about the planned murder. During a recorded call, Dent told Tryon that Powell had to be killed because the parole board would never let him out of jail if there was someone who was afraid of Dent. A police officer posed as Tryon and picked Balcinde up when he was released from jail. Balcinde confirmed the plan with the officer and was arrested when he reached for the money. The State of Washington (plaintiff) charged Dent and Balcinde with conspiracy to commit first-degree murder. Dent and Balcinde requested the trial court to instruct the jury that the substantial-step element of conspiracy requires more than mere preparation. The trial court denied the request and instructed the jury that the substantial-step element requires conduct that stongly indicates a criminal purpose. Dent and Balcinde were convicted and have appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Brachtenbach, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 554,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 554,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 30,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.