State v. Diaz

507 P.3d 1109, 170 Idaho 79 (2022)

From our private database of 47,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

State v. Diaz

Idaho Supreme Court
507 P.3d 1109, 170 Idaho 79 (2022)

Facts

When Ruben Diaz (defendant) approached stranger Clyde Vinsonhaler in Vinsonhaler’s front yard, Vinsonhaler thought Diaz appeared disoriented and lost. After speaking briefly with Diaz, Vinsonhaler decided to go inside and call the police for help. Diaz followed Vinsonhaler inside and stabbed Vinsonhaler multiple times in the face and elsewhere before police arrived. Vinsonhaler was severely injured. The state charged Diaz with aggravated battery. Diaz informed the state that he intended to offer testimony from Dr. James Davidson in his defense. Davidson would testify that Diaz was delusional at the time of the stabbing and believed he was attacking an alien, rather than a human, thus negating the mens rea, or criminal intent, necessary for aggravated battery. The state filed a motion in limine, or a pretrial motion seeking a ruling on the admissibility of evidence, asking the court to exclude Davidson’s testimony. The state argued that the testimony was irrelevant and advanced an insanity defense that was no longer recognized under Idaho law. The district court denied the motion, holding that Davidson’s testimony was relevant to negate the necessary intent for aggravated battery or to prove a mistake-of-fact defense. The state appealed to the Idaho Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Bevan, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 905,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 905,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,100 briefs, keyed to 995 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 905,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,100 briefs - keyed to 995 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership