State v. Duncan

593 P.2d 1026 (1979)

From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

State v. Duncan

Montana Supreme Court
593 P.2d 1026 (1979)

Facts

Norman Duncan (defendant) was president of Smart Pak, Inc., a subsidiary of Survival Heat Products, Inc. Smart Pak produced and marketed a dry granulated charcoal lighter (Smart Start) and a combination package of Smart Start and charcoal briquettes (Smark Pak). After Duncan discovered that automated packaging machines could not properly seal the special “child proof” paper used in the products, Duncan and other employees sold “package sealer agreements” in Gallatin County to those who paid between $500 to $5,000 to be exclusive sealers for Smart Pak. The sealers received all materials from Smart Pak, sealed the packages, and then sold the sealed bags back to the company. Shortly thereafter, Smart Pak came under federal and state investigation as to whether the sealer agreements were investment contracts which Duncan had failed to register. After Smart Pak ceased operations and went into receivership, the State charged Duncan with a four-count information, namely: (1) deceptive practices; (2) fraudulent securities practices; (3) failure to register securities; and (4) issuing a bad check. The trial court dismissed count 4 and Duncan pled not guilty to the other three counts. After Duncan waived his right to a trial by jury, the court found Duncan guilty on counts 1 and 3 and dismissed count 2. Duncan was sentenced to five years imprisonment on count 1 and three years imprisonment on count 3. The sentences ran concurrently. Duncan appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Sheehy, J.)

Concurrence/Dissent (Daly, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 778,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 778,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 778,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership