State v. Far West Water & Sewer Inc.

224 Ariz 173, 228 P.3d 909 (2010)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

State v. Far West Water & Sewer Inc.

Court of Appeals of Arizona
224 Ariz 173, 228 P.3d 909 (2010)

Facts

In October 2001, two employees of Far West Water & Sewer, Inc. (defendant), the owner and operator of a sewage-treatment facility, died in an underground tank after they entered without proper equipment and were suffocated by hydrogen sulfide gas. A third employee suffered serious injuries when he attempted to rescue the others. The State of Arizona (plaintiff) charged Far West with two counts of manslaughter, one count of aggravated assault, and various counts of endangerment and violating a safety standard or regulation. The state also charged Brent Weidman (defendant), Far West’s president and chief operating officer, with similar charges. At trial, the state introduced evidence concerning the responsibilities and background of Weidman and Rex Noll, Far West’s sewage-division supervisor. Both Weidman and Noll were professionals in the sewage-treatment industry, each with extensive training, knowledge, and experience with Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA) regulations and the regulations’ application to Far West’s operations. The jury convicted Far West of the lesser-included offense of negligent homicide, as well as aggravated assault, endangerment, and violation of safety standards. Far West appealed, contending that Weidman and Noll were not high-managerial agents whose actions could be attributed to the corporation, and that, in any event, Weidman and Noll did not possess the requisite mens rea for the charged crimes.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Weisberg, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership