State v. Favela

91 N.M. 476, 576 P.2d 282 (1978)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

State v. Favela

New Mexico Supreme Court
91 N.M. 476, 576 P.2d 282 (1978)

Facts

Ernestine Favela (defendant) had sexual relations with a 15-year-old boy, and the state (plaintiff) subsequently charged Favela with contributing to the delinquency of a minor (CDM). The felony of CDM was defined in the New Mexico Criminal Code as committing an act that caused or encouraged a minor’s delinquency. The New Mexico Children’s Code defined a delinquent act as an act committed by a child that would have been a crime if it had been committed by an adult. Favela filed a motion to dismiss the indictment, arguing that she could not be found guilty of contributing to the delinquency of a minor because if the boy were an adult, having sexual relations with Favela would not have been a crime, and therefore the boy could not be found delinquent for having intercourse with Favela. Favela’s motion was denied. Favela filed an interlocutory appeal, and the New Mexico Court of Appeals reversed, holding that Favela’s argument was correct. The New Mexico Supreme Court issued a writ of certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 825,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 825,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 825,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership