State v. Fernando A.
Connecticut Supreme Court
981 A.2d 427 (2009)
- Written by Meredith Hamilton Alley, JD
Facts
In family-violence matters, a Connecticut statute (the statute) authorized police to release a defendant pending nonfinancial conditions set by police, including, for example, prohibiting the defendant from contacting the alleged victim or returning to the family home. Fernando A. (defendant) was arrested for family-violence charges on October 14, 2007. The police released Fernando on the condition that he could not return to his family’s home or contact his wife, the alleged victim, before his first court appearance, which was the next day. On that date, the trial court issued a criminal protective order (CPO) as a condition of Fernando’s pretrial release. Fernando moved for an evidentiary hearing on the necessity of the CPO, and the court denied the motion. A few days later, at Fernando’s next court appearance, Fernando again moved for an evidentiary hearing and contested the continuation of the CPO. The trial court denied Fernando’s motion, explaining that a defendant was not entitled to a full evidentiary hearing before a CPO was extended. Fernando appealed, arguing that the trial court should have held an evidentiary hearing before issuing the CPO.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Norcott, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.