State v. Fisher

680 P.2d 35 (1984)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

State v. Fisher

Utah Supreme Court
680 P.2d 35 (1984)

Facts

Howard Fisher (defendant) believed that his wife, Zacoma, was having an affair with a prostitute, Jolene Scott, and that the affair was the reason Zacoma had left him. Fisher confronted Scott about his wife, and a fight ensued. Fisher strangled Scott during the fight and killed her. Fisher confessed to strangling Scott but claimed that he had only intended to make Scott fall unconscious through the strangulation, not to kill her. Fisher was charged with three variations of second-degree murder based on an intent to kill, an intent to cause serious bodily harm, or actions showing a depraved indifference to human life. The prosecution (plaintiff), in its opening statement, presented a description of evidence about Fisher’s intention to kill Scott that a subpoenaed witness was to present. The witness eventually refused to testify, however, after receiving threats from fellow inmates in the jail where he was incarcerated, and this evidence about Fisher’s intent to kill Scott was never presented at trial. Fisher was convicted and appealed. On appeal Fisher alleged that he was denied a fair trial because the prosecution’s opening statement included this reference to evidence showing an intent to kill that was never in fact presented to the jury.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Oaks, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership