State v. Gounagias

153 P. 9 (1915)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

State v. Gounagias

Washington Supreme Court
153 P. 9 (1915)

Play video

Facts

On April 19, 1914, Gounagias (defendant) and his Greek compatriot Dan George were consuming alcohol, which caused Gounagias to become incapacitated. George made offensive comments to Gounagias and ultimately committed the “unmentionable crime” (i.e., rape) against him. The next day, Gounagias begged George not to tell others about the incident, but George did tell some of their Greek countrymen. Thereafter, Gounagias was tormented and ridiculed by his countrymen and began suffering from illness and headaches as a result. On May 6, 1914, Gounagias was suffering from one such headache when he visited a coffeehouse where several of his countrymen were gathered. The group taunted Gounagias and made suggestive gestures, which, Gounagias maintained, caused him to fly into an uncontrollable rage. Gounagias maintains that he decided to kill George at that time. Gounagias ran to his own house to retrieve his revolver, went to George’s house, and shot George in the head five times while George slept. George died and Gounagias was charged with first degree murder. At trial, defense counsel urged that the evidence supported a lesser charge of manslaughter, but that argument was not permitted, and the jury was instructed only on murder. Likewise, the court excluded the evidence about George circulating the story against Gounagias’s wishes and the substance of what the countrymen said to taunt Gounagias right before the killing. The court also excluded the testimony of an expert psychiatrist who offered that Gounagias acted on an involuntary impulse triggered by memories stirred up when he was taunted at the coffeehouse. Gounagias was found guilty of murder and appealed the conviction on the grounds that the evidence should have been admitted.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Ellis, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership