Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

State v. Govan

Court of Appeals of Arizona
744 P.2d 712 (1987)


Facts

Joe Govan (defendant) moved into a home with Sharon Keeble and her teenage daughter. Govan and Keeble had a tumultuous relationship and regularly argued. At one point, Keeble accused Govan of molesting her daughter and fired a handgun at Govan. After Keeble missed, Govan left and returned with another handgun. Keeble was attempting to call the police when Govan shot her in the neck, paralyzing her from the neck down. Govan insisted that he did not intend to shoot Keeble. During her hospitalization, Govan and Keeble reconciled and eventually married. Five years later, Keeble contracted pneumonia while still paralyzed, but did not seek medical treatment for two weeks despite knowing that she was ill. Keeble had been suffering from extreme pain due to the quadriplegia and eventually died from pneumonia. Govan was indicted for second-degree murder. At trial, two physicians testified that Keeble’s death was caused by pneumonia stemming from the quadriplegia, which was in turn caused by the gunshot wound fired by Govan. Govan was convicted of the lesser-included offense of manslaughter. Govan filed a motion for judgment of acquittal, arguing that there was insufficient evidence to show that his gunshot caused Keeble’s paralysis and subsequent death. The trial court denied Govan’s motion. Govan appealed, arguing that Keeble broke the chain of causation by giving up her will to live.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Greer, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 223,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.