State v. Gowan
Montana Supreme Court
13 P.3d 376 (2000)
- Written by Angela Patrick, JD
Facts
Richard Gowan (defendant) was on trial for selling drugs. Gowan had a prior conviction for perjury. Before trial, the trial court ruled that evidence of Gowan’s perjury conviction was inadmissible character evidence. At trial, Gowan called Kris McPherson as a witness. McPherson was not identified as a character witness and did not testify about any character issues on direct examination. However, after answering a question during cross-examination, McPherson added an extra statement about Gowan being an honest and trusting person. The trial court ruled that this was character evidence from a defense witness that opened the door for rebuttal character testimony attacking Gowan’s character trait of honesty. Rebuttal evidence was then admitted to show Gowan’s propensity for dishonesty, including evidence of his previous perjury conviction and a lawsuit against him for not delivering a car title as promised. The jury convicted Gowan of the drug-sale charges, and Gowan appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Hunt, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.