State v. Gray

891 So. 2d 1260 (2005)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

State v. Gray

Louisiana Supreme Court
891 So. 2d 1260 (2005)

Facts

The State of Louisiana (plaintiff) charged Deonta and Jonta Gray (defendants) with the attempted second-degree murder of a taxi driver. Before Deonta and Jonta were arrested, Deonta’s aunt, Keyanta, arranged a meeting between Deonta, Jonta, and Keyanta’s minister, Reverend Jeffrey Woolridge. Keyanta told Woolridge that he was meeting with Deonta and Jonta to speak about a matter and to “lead them to Christ.” Keyanta, Deonta, Jonta, and Woolridge all attended the meeting. Jonta did not speak during the meeting, but Deonta told Woolridge that he and Jonta called a taxi driver intending to rob the driver and then shot the taxi driver when he arrived. Woolridge called his superior pastor, related the information from Deonta, and asked for advice. Deonta said nothing during the call. The pastor told Woolridge to notify the authorities. Woolridge prayed with Deonta, Jonta, and Keyanta and ended the meeting. According to Woolridge, Deonta seemed interested in changing his life. Woolridge subsequently gave a statement to police based on Deonta’s confession during the meeting. Before trial, Deonta filed a motion to suppress Woolridge’s statement, asserting that his statements to Woolridge were protected by the clergyman privilege in Article 511 of the Louisiana Code of Evidence. The trial court granted the motion to suppress, but the appellate court reversed. The trial court then denied the motion, finding, among other things, that Deonta had no expectation of privacy when he approached Woolridge. After appellate review, remand, and further appellate review, the appellate court ultimately held that the statement should be suppressed. The state sought review from the Louisiana Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Victory, J.)

Concurrence (Kimball, J.)

Concurrence (Calogero, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership