State v. Grover

437 N.W.2d 60 (1989)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

State v. Grover

Minnesota Supreme Court
437 N.W.2d 60 (1989)

  • Written by Liz Nakamura, JD

Facts

Curtis Grover (defendant) was an elementary school principal. On four occasions between 1984 and 1986, Curtis received reports from various parents that their child had been physically assaulted or inappropriately touched by one particular teacher at the school. Despite being a mandated reporter, Curtis failed to report any of the incidents to law enforcement or children’s services. In 1987, the local police department received two reports alleging that the same teacher sexually abused students. During the police investigation, officers discovered that Grover had failed to report the abuse allegations he had received from parents between 1984 and 1986. The State of Minnesota (plaintiff) charged Grover under Minnesota’s mandated-reporter statute with failing to report child abuse, a misdemeanor. Grover moved to dismiss, arguing that the mandated-reporter statute was (1) vague and overbroad; and (2) impinged on his right to free speech by forcing him to report abuse allegations even if he did not personally believe the allegations were true. The trial court granted Grover’s motion to dismiss. Minnesota appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Coyne, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 830,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership