State v. Gunnison
Arizona Supreme Court
127 Ariz. 110 (1980)

- Written by Sara Rhee, JD
Facts
Robert Harlan Gunnison Jr. (defendant) was indicted for criminal conspiracy to unlawfully sell securities. At trial, Gunnison sought to establish that he did not possess specific intent to commit the crime. Gunnison argued that he acted in good faith because he had been advised that the contemplated sales were legal. The trial court excluded the evidence regarding good faith, ruling that specific intent to violate a known law was not a required element to establish conspiracy. The court of appeals reversed, and the case went before the Arizona Supreme Court for review.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Cameron, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.