Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status
From our private database of 18,300+ case briefs...

State v. Harrington

Vermont Supreme Court
260 A.2d 692 (1969)


John Harrington (defendant) was an attorney retained by Norma Morin to obtain a divorce from her husband, Armand Morin. Because Norma was unable to pay, Harrington agreed to work on a contingent fee basis. The Morins had assets worth about $50,000, including a motel in New Hampshire. Harrington and Norma hired a woman armed with a tape recorder, to entice Armand into having sex in one of his motel rooms. The woman succeeded and at the opportune moment, Harrington and his associates entered the hotel room and took pictures of the naked pair in bed. Thereafter, Harrington dictated a letter to Armand proposing a divorce settlement where Norma would give up her interest in the marital assets and would waive alimony in exchange for a lump sum of $175,000. The letter also stated that if he agreed to the proposal, Armand would receive the tape recording and the pictures taken of his infidelity. Harrington noted that if Armand did not timely respond to his letter, the offer would be withdrawn and not only would they produce the tape recordings and photos during divorce proceedings on the ground of adultery, Harrington said he might advise Norma to file for “informer fees” with the Internal Revenue Service and U.S. Customs Service regarding illegal conduct in which Armand was engaged. Harrington included one of the photos taken of Armand and the woman from the hotel room. Harrington was convicted under a Vermont law which stated, “a person who maliciously threatens to accuse another of a crime or offense, or with an injury to his person or property, with intent to extort money or other pecuniary advantage, or with intent to compel the person so threatened to do an act against his will, shall be imprisoned in the state prison not more than two years or fined not more than $500.00.” Harrington appealed, filing a motion for acquittal.

Rule of Law


Holding and Reasoning (Holden, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 486,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 486,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 18,300 briefs, keyed to 985 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions & Answers

Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Sign up for a FREE 7-day trial