State v. Hinkle
West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals
200 W.Va. 280, 489 S.E.2d 257 (1996)
West Virginia (plaintiff) prosecuted Charles Rhea Hinkle (defendant) after Hinkle's car crashed into another vehicle, killing one of that vehicle's occupants. At trial, Hinkle testified that he was unconscious at the time of the accident, and two witnesses corroborated Hinkle's testimony. A medical expert testified that a hitherto undiagnosable brain disorder could have caused the loss of consciousness to which Hinkle attributed the accident. Prior West Virginia cases treated pleas of unconsciousness as included within the insanity defense, and therefore Hinkle pleaded that he was insane at the time of the accident. The judge instructed the jury only that Hinkle suffered from a cognitive disorder. The jury convicted Hinkle and he appealed to the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Cleckley, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 725,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 725,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,700 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.