State v. Hoselton
Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia
179 W.Va. 645 (1988)
- Written by Sara Rhee, JD
Facts
Hoselton (defendant) was charged with entering without breaking, with the intent to commit larceny. Hoselton had been standing on a barge while several of his friends entered a storage unit at the other end of the barge. Hoselton was unaware that his friends intended to steal items from the storage unit until he walked closer and saw his friends removing the goods. He then walked to their car and waited until his friends returned with the stolen items. Hoselton neither helped his friends place the items in the car, nor received any of the items. At trial, the State (plaintiff) asked Hoselton whether he was a lookout for his friends. Hoselton replied, “You could say that,” and stated that he just did not want to be present during the commission of the crime. Hoselton was convicted as a principal in the first degree. Hoselton appeals, arguing that there is insufficient evidence to support his conviction.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 778,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.