State v. Hoselton

179 W.Va. 645 (1988)

From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

State v. Hoselton

Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia
179 W.Va. 645 (1988)

SR
Play video

Facts

Hoselton (defendant) was charged with entering without breaking, with the intent to commit larceny. Hoselton had been standing on a barge while several of his friends entered a storage unit at the other end of the barge. Hoselton was unaware that his friends intended to steal items from the storage unit until he walked closer and saw his friends removing the goods. He then walked to their car and waited until his friends returned with the stolen items. Hoselton neither helped his friends place the items in the car, nor received any of the items. At trial, the State (plaintiff) asked Hoselton whether he was a lookout for his friends. Hoselton replied, “You could say that,” and stated that he just did not want to be present during the commission of the crime. Hoselton was convicted as a principal in the first degree. Hoselton appeals, arguing that there is insufficient evidence to support his conviction.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 778,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 778,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 778,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership