Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

State v. Hunter

Supreme Court of Kansas
740 P.2d 559 (1987)


At the time of this case, § 21-3401 of the Kansas Statutes precluded use of the defense of compulsion  in cases where the defendant was charged with first degree  murder or voluntary homicide, but did not specifically state whether the defense was permitted in felony murder cases. Hunter (defendant) hitched a ride in a truck in which Remeta and others were riding. Remeta, after brandishing guns and making threatening comments to Hunter about killing hitchhikers, shot and wounded a policeman who had pulled the truck over. The group then proceeded to a grain elevator, where Remata, apparently assisted by Hunter, took two people as hostages. After the truck had proceeded some distance, Remata shot and killed the hostages. Hunter was charged with two counts of felony murder for his participation in the kidnapping and killing of the hostages. At Hunter’s trial, witnesses for the State (plaintiff) testified that Hunter had been armed, but both Hunter and Remata testified that only Remata was armed and that Remata had ordered Hunter to watch the hostages. There was testimony that Hunter had been out of Remata’s sight at the back of the elevator building for a period of about five minutes, but Hunter testified that he did not think he had a chance to escape. The court refused Hunter’s request to instruct the jury on the defense of compulsion on the ground that § 21-3401 precluded the defense in cases of felony murder. Hunter was convicted of felony murder and appealed to the Supreme Court of Kansas.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.


The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 202,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.