State v. Irons
Court of Appeals of Kansas
815 P.2d 1133 (1991)
- Written by Samantha Arena, JD
Facts
Brandon Irons (defendant) was sent to the Wichita Community Residential Center (CRC), a work-release facility for inmates. One day, Irons signed out to go to work but failed to return the next morning. Irons was eventually charged with aggravated escape from custody. Prior to trial, the state made a motion requesting that the court exclude any evidence pertaining to Irons’s motives for escaping. During the motion hearing, Irons testified that the other inmates had become angry about an interview he had given about the CRC. After Irons signed out to go to work, he was chased by two inmates and ran into a store for safety. The inmates told Irons that they were going to kill him when he returned. While at work, Irons called the CRC and spoke to Ryan, the assistant administrator, who agreed to call Irons later that evening but never did. Irons called again a number of times but could not reach Ryan. Instead of returning to the CRC, Irons went to Texas and stayed there until he was arrested five months later. Irons argued that his testimony supported a defense of compulsion under Kansas law, which provided that a person was not guilty of a crime based on conduct performed under the compulsion or threat of imminent death or great bodily harm. The trial court granted the state’s motion and excluded Irons’s testimony, concluding that the threats were not sufficiently imminent to allow for a compulsion defense. Irons was convicted of aggravated escape and appealed the conviction.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Memorandum opinion)
Dissent (Davis, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.