Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

State v. Jenkins

276 S.C. 209, 277 S.E.2d 147 (1981)

Case BriefQ&ARelatedOptions
From our private database of 22,600+ case briefs...

State v. Jenkins

South Carolina Supreme Court

276 S.C. 209, 277 S.E.2d 147 (1981)

Facts

Robert Jenkins (defendant) stabbed the victim, who lost substantial amounts of blood. The victim was taken to a hospital. The hospital performed a routine test called an arteriogram to determine the extent of the injuries to major blood vessels. This procedure involved a dye, and the victim had a rare and fatal reaction to the dye. The immediate cause of death was the reaction to the dye, but the victim would have died without medical treatment. The State of South Carolina (plaintiff) charged Jenkins with murder. The trial court submitted three possible verdicts to the jury: murder, manslaughter, and not guilty. The trial court also instructed the jury that there must be a causal relationship between Jenkins’s acts and the death of the victim before criminal liability may be imposed. The jury convicted Jenkins of murder. Jenkins appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 519,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 519,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 22,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions and answers

Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 519,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 22,600 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership