State v. Jennings

2002 Ohio 7266 (2002)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

State v. Jennings

Ohio Court of Appeals
2002 Ohio 7266 (2002)

Play video

Facts

Late one evening, Melody Kay drove to her boyfriend’s place of employment to pick him up. Kay left her vehicle unlocked with her purse, which contained a Citi Bank credit card, a Bank One money card, and other items, inside the car. Five minutes later, Kay returned to her car to find her purse missing. James Jennings (defendant) and two other men were seen running from the area into the woods and were later apprehended by police officers. The police officers found Kay’s Citi Bank credit card and Bank One money card at Jennings’s feet. The State of Ohio (plaintiff) charged Jennings with receiving stolen property. After a trial, a jury convicted Jennings, and he appealed, arguing that the state failed to prove that Jennings had possession of Kay’s credit and money cards. Jennings also argued that a money card was not the same as a credit card under state law.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Nader, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 807,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 807,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 807,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership