Maine Supreme Judicial Court
34 A.3d 1139 (2012)
William Campbell, an agent with the Maine Drug Enforcement Agency (MDEA) spoke to Scott Knowlton (defendant) whom he believed was engaged in drug trafficking operations. After being questioned by Campbell for a brief period of time in a police station interview room, Knowlton became upset and requested to speak with an attorney. Campbell immediately terminated the interview and placed Knowlton under arrest. A short time later, Campbell allowed Knowlton to speak with his mother and girlfriend. Campbell then transferred Knowlton by car to a jail approximately an hour away. During the trip, Campbell allowed Knowlton to use his cell phone to speak with his mother again. Knowlton also told Campbell that he wanted to cooperate but that he was scared. A few blocks from the jail, Campbell again informed Knowlton that if he wanted to talk with him after speaking to an attorney to just let him know. Knowlton then agreed to talk with Campbell without an attorney present. Instead of proceeding to the jail, Campbell drove to a nearby MDEA office where he prepared a written waiver of rights form to be signed by Knowlton. After signing the form, Knowlton made several incriminating statements. The time between Knowlton’s invoking his right to counsel and his subsequent written waiver was five hours. At no time did Knowlton confer with an attorney. Knowlton was indicted for aggravated trafficking of scheduled drugs, unlawful trafficking in scheduled drugs, and illegal importation of scheduled drugs. Defense counsel filed a motion to suppress the statements Knowlton made to Campbell at the MDEA office. After a hearing, the trial court granted the motion. The State appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Levy, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 220,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.