State v. Langford

467 So.2d 41 (1985)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

State v. Langford

Louisiana Court of Appeal
467 So.2d 41 (1985)

Facts

Langford (defendant) opened an interest-earning checking account (a NOW account) at the Hibernia National Bank in New Orleans, Louisiana, with a deposit of $5,362.21. When the account was processed into the bank’s computer it was mistakenly assigned a code which provided for unlimited overdrafts without charge to Langford. Several months later, the bank learned that the account was overdrawn by $848,879.39, and had been overdrawn a few weeks after it was opened by Langford. Since opening the account, Langford made no additional deposits and had written over 200 checks on the account. Each day, Langford was notified of the overdrafts that had resulted and each month received a statement indicating the negative balance in the account. Computer printouts showing Langford’s overdrawn amount were supposed to be reviewed by a bank manager daily, but were routinely thrown in the trash and never reviewed. The bank immediately demanded payment of the overdraft amount, but Langford was not able to pay and instead, offered to execute a note in the bank’s favor. Langford was convicted of theft and sentenced to serve eight years in prison. Langford appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Schott, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 815,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership