State v. Larson
South Dakota Supreme Court
582 N.W.2d 15 (1998)
Brian Larson (defendant) was driving his vehicle at speeds between 62 to 68 miles per hour (mph) in a 55-mph, occupied construction zone when he crossed the center line for a “split second” and struck and killed two construction workers. Larson was convicted of two counts of second degree manslaughter under state statute that defined the crime in terms of the reckless killing of another. Thereafter, the trial court denied Larson’s motion for a judgment of acquittal. Larson appealed, arguing that there was insufficient evidence of “recklessness” to support the convictions because his conduct did not rise above mere negligence or inadvertence.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Sabers, J.)
Dissent (Amundson, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.