State v. Leyda

138 P.3d 610 (2006)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

State v. Leyda

Washington Supreme Court
138 P.3d 610 (2006)

Facts

On October 21, 2002, Steven Leyda (defendant) had the credit card of woman named Cynthia Austin. Leyda gave the credit card to his girlfriend, Nikkoleen Cooley, who used it to purchase items at the Bon Marché store in the SeaTac Mall. The couple returned to the store two more times to purchase different items with Austin’s credit card. On November 2, 2002, Cooley attempted to use the card at the Bon Marché for the fourth time. The cashier suspected it was stolen. He contacted the Bon Marché Loss Prevention Department and requested that Cooley show identification. Cooley said her identification was in the car, and she and Leyda left the store with Austin’s card. Meanwhile, Cynthia Austin was contacted and informed of the situation. She told the Bon Marché employee that she had not given her credit card to anyone to use. Not long after, Leyda and Cooley were stopped by police and arrested. Leyda was charged and convicted of four counts of identity theft for the four separate uses of Austin’s credit card. The Court of Appeals affirmed. Leyda appealed to the state supreme court on the basis that his multiple identity-theft convictions violated his constitutional right against double jeopardy.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Alexander, C.J.)

Dissent (Johnson, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership