State v. Linscott

520 A.2d 1067 (1987)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
S
From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

State v. Linscott

Maine Supreme Judicial Court
520 A.2d 1067 (1987)

SR
Play video

Facts

William Linscott (defendant) was convicted for the murder of Norman Grenier, a drug dealer. Linscott and his friend Joel Fuller planned to rob Grenier. Their plan involved breaking a window of Grenier’s home and showing Grenier their gun, so as to discourage any resistance from him. At Grenier’s home, Linscott broke the window as planned. But instead of showing Grenier the gun, Fuller immediately fired the gun through the broken window and hit Grenier in the chest, killing him. Fuller then took $1,300 from Grenier’s pocket and left. At trial, Linscott testified that he did not intend for Grenier to die as a result of the robbery. The trial court found Linscott guilty of robbery. The court also found Linscott guilty of murder as an accomplice because Grenier’s death was a natural and probable consequence of the robbery. Linscott appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Scolnik, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Criminal Law

Key Terms