State v. Loomis

881 N.W.2d 749 (2016)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

State v. Loomis

Wisconsin Supreme Court
881 N.W.2d 749 (2016)

  • Written by Robert Cane, JD

Facts

Eric Loomis (defendant) was given the maximum sentence for two charges related to a drive-by shooting. The sentencing judge used a Correctional Offender Management Profiling for Alternative Sanctions (COMPAS) risk assessment contained in the Presentence Investigation Report (PSI) as one factor in determining to give Loomis the maximum sentence with no probation. The COMPAS risk assessment is a tool designed to assess the level of risk that a criminal defendant will reoffend. To calculate risk, COMPAS uses mostly static information about the criminal defendant from his criminal history and his answers to questions for the PSI, mixed with some dynamic variables based on statistical data. The tool ranks the defendant’s level of risk of recidivism on scale of one to 10, but it does not provide detail on exactly how the score is calculated. COMPAS indicated that Loomis was a high risk for recidivism. Loomis filed a motion for a new sentencing hearing, alleging a due-process violation. The motion was denied, and Loomis appealed to the Wisconsin Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Bradley, J.)

Concurrence (Abrahamson, J.)

Concurrence (Roggensack, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership