State v. Lucas

896 So. 2d 331 (2005)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

State v. Lucas

Louisiana Court of Appeal
896 So. 2d 331 (2005)

Facts

Rondall Lucas (defendant) was driving on the highway when he allegedly pulled his truck alongside another car and moved his pelvis up and down in the window while exposing his penis. At Lucas’s trial on obscenity charges, the judge placed all the witnesses under sequestration. The witnesses were not allowed in the courtroom to hear the other witnesses’ testimony, they were not allowed to discuss the other witnesses’ testimony with anyone, and they were not allowed to discuss their own testimony in the presence of other witnesses. At one point during trial, the prosecution (plaintiff) asked for a hearing about a possible violation of the sequestration order by all of the defense’s witnesses. An employee of the district attorney’s office testified at the hearing that she saw the witnesses talking and laughing in the hallway and that it looked as though they were trying to demonstrate Lucas’s alleged pelvic motion. The witnesses testified that they had not been talking about the case or making any pelvic motions related to the case. There was no evidence at the hearing that the witnesses had seen or heard any of the testimony in the courtroom or that Lucas knew about the witnesses’ actions. Following the hearing, the trial court found that the witnesses had violated the sequestration order and barred the witnesses from testifying at trial. The jury ultimately found Lucas guilty, and he appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Stewart, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership