State v. Marian
Ohio Supreme Court
62 Ohio St. 2d 250 (1980)
- Written by Sharon Feldman, JD
Facts
Joseph Marian (defendant) and John Protain planned to murder Marian’s wife. Marian gave Protain a gun and $500. Protain decided not to murder Marian’s wife, pretended to participate, and notified the authorities. Marian was charged with conspiracy to commit aggravated murder. The court dismissed the indictment, reasoning that conspiracy requires that at least two people plan an unlawful objective and one person commit a substantial overt act toward completing the objective. Because Protain did not intend to participate, Marian could not be convicted. The court of appeals reversed, holding that conspiracy can be committed if one person believes he is agreeing with another person to achieve an unlawful objective even if the other person does not intend to achieve the objective. The state supreme court granted review.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Celebrezze, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.