State v. Marr

765 A.2d 645, 362 Md. 467 (2001)

From our private database of 46,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

State v. Marr

Maryland Court of Appeals
765 A.2d 645, 362 Md. 467 (2001)

Play video

Facts

In Maryland, Arthur Carroll and Kevin Jackson went to Nathaniel Marr’s home to commit a robbery. While searching Marr’s home, Carroll and Jackson shot and killed Ronald Muse, Marr’s cousin. Marr later went looking for Carroll and Jackson, allegedly to talk about Muse’s murder. Marr saw Carroll walking toward a waiting taxi. Carroll grabbed at Marr’s waist, and Marr fired shots, claiming that he feared for his life. One of the bullets entered the taxi and struck Jimmy Abass, the driver. Marr was charged with the murder of Carroll and the first-degree assault of Abass. In a statement to the police, Marr said that he was scared when he heard about Muse’s death and was armed when he approached Carroll in order to protect himself. At trial, the court instructed the jury on the defenses of perfect and imperfect self-defense. Marr requested additional instructions for the jury to judge the reasonableness of Marr’s actions based on the facts as they appeared to Marr at the time of the events. The trial court refused to give the additional instructions. Marr was convicted. Marr appealed, arguing that the trial court erred in refusing the instructions. Maryland’s intermediate court of appeals held that the refusal constituted reversible error.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Wilner, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 744,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 744,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,000 briefs, keyed to 987 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 744,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,000 briefs - keyed to 987 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership