State v. McKee

392 N.W.2d 493 (1986)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

State v. McKee

Iowa Supreme Court
392 N.W.2d 493 (1986)

  • Written by Liz Nakamura, JD

Facts

Paula McKee (defendant) was accused of intentionally physically abusing a resident at Woodward State Health Care Facility (Woodward), a mental health hospital. McKee was a Woodward employee. The State of Iowa (plaintiff) submitted a trial information to the district court charging McKee with wanton neglect of a healthcare facility resident. Iowa’s wanton-neglect statute prohibited a person from “knowingly [acting] in a manner likely to be injurious to the physical, mental, or moral welfare” of a healthcare facility resident. McKee moved to dismiss the trial information, arguing that (1) Iowa’s wanton-neglect statute was unconstitutionally vague; and (2) the statute’s prohibition against intentionally injuring residents was difficult to apply in the context of a mental health hospital because employees often needed to physically restrain residents either in self-defense or to protect the resident. The district court dismissed the trial information, holding that the wanton-neglect statute was unconstitutionally vague because it contained ambiguous language and lacked specific enforcement standards. Iowa appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Schultz, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 805,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership